Wednesday, May 29, 2019
The Disease Of Masturbation :: essays research papers
The unhealthiness of Masturbation Values and the concept of Disease by EngelhardtEnglhardts article The Disease Of Masturbation is an example of the ways in which determine impact societys definition of disease. I agree that it is possible that science is being, or has been, limited by the values within society. For science to conclude that masturbation safaris such aliments as blindness and epilepsy it appears evident that science is being misguided by values of the time. I deal that science also realizes that values play a part in research conducted, otherwise there would be no need for blind and reprize blind studies. Blind studies are used to help eliminate bias brought on by the experimenter or the test subject.In the eighteenth and nineteenth speed of light masturbation was thought to produce the signs and symptoms of a dangerous disease Disease is neither an objective entity nor a concept of a single definition, there is not, nor need be, unrivalled concept of disease (UWO, p.241). The problem with Englehardts article is our health system is that of the biomedical model. The biomedical model does not recognize masturbation as a disease. It states that disease is a biological excursus from the norm that can be explained scientifically (Charland). Masturbation has not been proven to fit into either category. Masturbation may have been a deviation from the norm at one point in time, but I do not believe that it can be explained scientifically. Englehardts article says that masturbation was the cause of such illnesses as blindness and vertigo. But how were these conclusions drawn? Were these conclusions scientific in nature or gathered according to the views and values of the times? Masturbation was glum into a disease, not with just somatic, but psychological dimensions. Tissot states that masturbating is even more debilitating than sex because of a loss of seminal fluid (1oz equals 40oz of blood). When seminal loss takes place in a position othe r than the recumbent position the effects are multiplied. Tissot successfully establishes that masturbation is associated with physical and mental maladies. Englehardt should stipulate how Tissot reaches this conclusion. thither are also disagreements as to whether frequent sex is any different than masturbation. It is argued that the difference between masturbation and sex is the expenditure of nerve force that is equilibrise by the magnetism of the partner. Masturbation is worse because it is unnatural and therefore less satisfying.